An intersection of a logarithm and a horizontal line amounts to solving a logarithmic equation. We find where meets the line .
At the crossing the values are equal, so . Raise to both sides.
Since and are inverses, the left side collapses back to , leaving . The intersection is , with .
Solving a logarithmic equation is exactly this act of exponentiating. If then , which, given that answers the question of what power of yields , is little more than the definition read back to front.
The function is defined only for and increases monotonically, so it never repeats a height and can meet a horizontal line at most once. And because its range is all real numbers, it meets the line at exactly one point for every . Contrast the exponential, whose range is limited to and which therefore misses any line with . Being inverses, the two functions have their domains and ranges swapped, and that is what shows up here.
| Line | -coordinate of the intersection | Approximate value |
|---|---|---|
Each unit of height costs a factor of in . How slowly climbs is written plainly in the spacing of these intersections.
The base makes no difference to the argument. If then ; if then . In other words, the crossing of a logarithm with the line always sits at equal to the base itself. The base of is , so the intersection had to be all along. The larger the base, the farther right the crossing, and the more gently the curve climbs.
The point is the reflection across the line of the point , where the exponential meets the vertical line . It is a small confirmation that the graphs of inverse functions are mirror images in . The large dot on the graph is the intersection .