is an exponential with a linear function subtracted. The fact that its minimum value is exactly is precisely the most basic inequality about the exponential function, .
The domain is all real numbers. The derivative is as follows.
It vanishes when , that is at . It is negative for , where , and positive for , so the function has a minimum, both local and global, at , of value .
Since the minimum is , the range is . Rewriting this gives the following, valid for every real .
Equality holds only at . The line is the tangent to at , so the inequality is an instance of the fact that a concave-up curve lies above its tangent lines. The graph of can be read as the vertical gap between those two.
The second derivative is , always positive, so the curve is concave up everywhere and has no inflection point. That convexity is exactly why the tangent-line inequality holds.
As the term tends to and approaches ; indeed , so the line is a slant asymptote. As , by contrast, overwhelms and the function diverges with no asymptote at all. The result is a markedly asymmetric shape: hugging a straight line on the left, shooting up exponentially on the right.
Because there is no -intercept, so the equation has no real solution. More generally the number of solutions of is the number of intersections of this graph with the horizontal line .
| Range of | Number of solutions |
|---|---|
| none | |
| , at | |
Substituting for gives an inequality about the logarithm.
Bounding a logarithm above by a linear function in this way is the starting point of many proofs, including the relation between the arithmetic and geometric means and Gibbs' inequality in information theory. Of all the inequalities about the exponential function, is the one to learn first.
The curve passes through , , and .